Why You Shouldn’t Watch “West Side Story” (2021)
May 6, 2021
Trigger warning: this article includes discussions of sexual assault, rape, grooming, pedophilia, sexual coercion.
The first trailer for “West Side Story” (2021) was dropped during the 93rd Academy Awards. With Steven Spielberg at its helm and its star-studded cast as the crew, it has already been marked as a shoo-in for next year’s Oscars. Additionally, it has already received a degree of praise from the press that could make any movie a fan-favorite for years to come.
“West Side Story” is a certified classic. William Shakespeare’s “Romeo and Juliet” inspired the 1957 musical, which was so beloved it merited a film adaptation in 1961. The 1961 film has been the most accessible medium to date. “West Side Story” (1961) is a fantastic adaptation of the musical, except for one glaring casting misstep. The role of Maria is played by Natalie Wood, a Jewish woman. Maria’s Latina identity is integral to both her character and the plot. Natalie Wood’s performance made Maria a role for Jewish women and has since been regarded as a primary piece of Jewish representation for decades.
The positive reception of the 2021 adaptation following the trailer drop rests on the history of Maria’s casting. “West Side Story” (2021) gets to represent the beloved story to a new audience, and they have made the conscious decision to cast Rachel Zegler -17 and Columbian American – as Maria. This chief casting decision is the crux of the praise, as it is the biggest representation of Spielberg’s efforts to return this story back to the community it represents.
The casting decisions of this film are what distinguish it, and the entirety of the discourse surrounding the film focuses on the genius casting, especially on Zegler’s position as a Hollywood underdog achieving her dreams. In building the praise of this adaptation on the casting decisions, the discourse has completely disregarded Ansel Elgort’s role as Tony, the lead male. If the praise is being built on the casting of the main characters, the conversation has intentionally left Elgort out, and what he has done that not only undermines that praise, but undermines Spielberg’s effort to make a socially conscious remake of a beloved movie.
Ansel Elgort broke into Hollywood as the beloved AugustusWaters in the film adaptation of John Green’s “The Fault in Our Stars” (2014). Since then, he has had a couple of major roles, but the major controversy he faces comes from the era of “The Fault in Our Stars” and the audience it was directed at.
Content warning: graphic description of rape, coercion, and sexual harassment.
“The Fault in Our Stars” was primarily directed at young girls ages 10-18, and the vast majority of fan attention Elgort received following his debut was from this demographic. In June of 2020, Twitter user @ItsGabby accused Ansel Elgort of raping her back in 2014, when she was 17 and he was 20. She also provided screenshots and photos of them together. She direct-messaged him when she was 16, and he gave her his private Snapchat so they could continue talking. Gabby’s post details how she was two days away from being seventeen when they texted, and that, when they met up when she was 17, he pressured her into engaging in sexual relations with him. With their age difference and his status as a major pop-culture figure, it is essential to include the implicit coercion that exists in any relationship with a power imbalance this large. Gabby’s initial tweet also includes her story where she details how she was too young to consent, too young to have sex, and said she didn’t want to, and that he imposed himself on her anyway. She includes quotes and comments Elgort made while it was happening that make it clear he was aware of her youth, and that he discredited her reluctance and refusal as naïve fear. He made comments like “we have to break you in” and commented on how sexy she’d be when she was older. Gabby’s account details every aspect of her body language that communicated that she did not consent to having sex with him, as well as how she dissociated and stayed completely still throughout. Gabby has diagnosed PTSD and panic attacks that she regularly deals with because of Elgort’s actions.
Despite the backlash working to discredit her, her allegations were all but confirmed.
Content warning: graphic descriptions end
Ansel Elgort’s response confirmed that he had sex with Gabby, knew her, that the screenshots were real, and that they did have a relationship. He denies that he raped or sexually assaulted her, and consistently stated how they had a consensual relationship between two adults. The only concession or apology he made is that he wasn’t completely respectful and that he’s “disgusted” by his actions.
With rape accusations, it is always important to give the benefit of the doubt to both parties. Most news outlets who covered the allegations granted Elgort this by discrediting the validity of Gabby’s claim and devaluing her evidence. They describe the screenshots and photographs by saying “alleged first interaction”, or “photo of young girl and Elgort”, refusing to confirm these photos include Gabby. Ansel Elgort took that argumentative bullet out of their gun by confirming their relationship and all of her evidence, though denying they did anything nonconsensual. I believe her, and, based on all her evidence and his response, you should too.
So then, what to do about the movie? The power of the 2021 remake is to rid the film of the controversy it faced in the past by casting Maria as a Latina woman, and asking Rita Moreno (a Puerto-Rican woman) to consult on the film gives it the representational ethos it needs to reinforce it in the public eye. Rachel Zegler deserves this role, and she has appropriately received attention that recognizes how big of an opportunity this is for her. The film has already been postponed in production, and since the trailer has been released, it is almost impossible to convince them to reshoot the entire movie without Ansel Elgort. The cast and crew of “West Side Story” (2021) have been silent on the allegations against Elgort, with the exception of Rachel Zegler as she liked several tweets calling people out to support victims of sexual assault by believing them.
In order to respect the work of Rachel Zegler and Rita Moreno, follow their careers and their other projects. But out of respect for Gabby and sexual assault survivors, do not support this movie. Do not give this movie your money by streaming it or seeing it in the theater. This remake is an insincere cash grab using the call of correct representation to reach a new demographic. Any ethos in their claims of social responsibility is lost in their radio silence on the allegations against Ansel Elgort. He has a major role in this film, and supporting it is directly communicating that rape is not a deal breaker. Keeping him in this film, as they are clearly doing, is simply besmirching this beloved story with another scandal, except this is one that cannot be redeemed years from now unless Elgort rapes another person who goes public with their story, Gabby’s trauma and the work she did to share it will be fruitless as Elgort’s career will continue to thrive from his major role in this major blockbuster. Don’t support this movie, as a consumer or as a bystander. Ansel Elgort has not been held responsible by the industry, so now it is our responsibility to be active consumers and continue the conversation about sexual assault and the entertainment industry to protect future audiences from falling prey to this known predator.
NN ~ Dec 20, 2021 at 5:18 pm
Obviously, I don’t know what really happened between Ansel and Gabby, but as a Latina woman, seeing this remake is very empowering and important. Many people are saying that it didn’t need to be remade, but I whole-heartedly disagree. It is absolutely ridiculous to say that the 1961 movie was good enough. Rita Moreno was one of the only (if not the only) hispanic actor in the 1961 movie for a musical literally about the racial injustices between white and hispanic cultures in the United States. There are so many other people in this movie that deserve support and even if you do believe the allegations against Ansel Elgort, everyone part of this movie should not have to suffer for his actions. He was casted before the allegations, so avoid his future work but this was done before Spielberg knew, and Spielberg has created a masterpiece.
Danielle ~ Dec 13, 2021 at 5:44 pm
Notwithstanding the nature of the publication and subsequent audience I am not convinced that the writer of the article can present this as unbiased journalism.
Responsible reporting supported by facts (confirmed) should always take priority over public or personal opinion, regardless the platform on which it is presented.
Royal S Dellinger ~ Dec 13, 2021 at 2:56 pm
Set aside that Natalie Wood was Russian Orthodox, not Jewish. Religion does not define ethnicity or nationality. There may be a host of reasons to avoid this movie. But the author’s biases are among them . . .
Sel ~ Dec 10, 2021 at 10:50 pm
The Puerto Rican community isn’t “represented” in this film. It is, decades later, stereotyped yet again – as violent thieves, gang members, troublemakers who came to America (we ARE American and have been since 1917) to live off the government. Again the film perpetuates dangerous, racist stereotypes just as the original play. Yes, the work became a classic. Beloved even. Rita Moreno was amazing and is an icon for the ages. Many in the community embrace it and that is the right of those who do but make no mistake, Puerto Rican and LatinX people will again be on the receiving end of the vile comments, reinforced hateful opinions and racism. A community who fought and has some of the highest per capita percentages of members who enlisted in every war since becoming legal citizens 104 years ago.
All this film does is stand to remind the general public of what dirt the LatinX community is and that is NOT what this community deserves.
Let alone bring misrepresented yet again by people who are not even a part of the LatinX community or culture. It didn’t need making let alone recreating.
Alex Stepanyk ~ Dec 8, 2021 at 10:57 pm
How many errors can you make in one article? Natalie Wood was NOT Jewish and it seems that you have some anti Semitic feelings inside yourself that you should seek help for. As for the rape charge a Twitter accusation is worthless. Women sometimes do lie about being raped. Not often, true, but it does happen. Enough people chose not to believe the accusation or he would never have gotten this part in West Side Story b
rsp ~ Nov 22, 2021 at 11:27 am
Did you ever post a correction to the incredibly bad journalistic mistake about Natalie Wood? Focusing (mistakenly) on the Jewishness rather than just the fact that it was a non-Latinx actor…anti-semitic? At least acknowledge the original error!
Cathy breitfeller ~ Nov 14, 2021 at 9:49 pm
I’m a huge fan of the 1961 original and didn’t like the idea of a remake as Hollywood can’t seem to get them right. That being I AM going to see this remake & will make my own decision.
mplo ~ Oct 27, 2021 at 1:26 pm
Your title says it all, Ellie! I am in complete agreement with you, and, for a number of reasons that would take up too much space and time to post on here, as well as Ansel Elgort’s grotesque, dangerous and disgusting behavior (i. e. sexual assault on and the grooming of underaged girls), I will be voting my pocketbook and not going to see Steve Spielberg’s upcoming film version of West Side Story at all, when it hit the movie theatres this December.
Deborah Salant ~ Dec 3, 2021 at 10:32 pm
This sounds very antisemitic in nature, Natalie would was not Jewish.
Why did you have to focus on this. You could have said she was white not Latina.
Shame on you.
Bob Ford ~ Sep 9, 2021 at 12:25 pm
I will watch Spielberg’s West Side Story. I hope it’s better than the original, and if it is, I’ll watch it many times, just as I have seen the 1961 version many times. I’ll judge the movie, and every aspect of the movie including the casting, on its artistic merits and nothing else. I’ll “suspend disbelief” and try not to look at it through a political lense, which is never a good idea and has no place in assessing the value of an artwork.
richardB ~ Aug 28, 2021 at 1:29 pm
It’s “Colombian-American” not “Columbian-American” I wouldn’t waste my money on this for any reason. The original is and always will be a classic.
Mr B Terrible ~ Jun 22, 2021 at 3:16 pm
The idea of boycotting movies due to the actions of one individual involved is one that I don’t subscribe to.
Movies are made by hundreds of people (often more) that put in countless hours and effort to bring the thing to the big screen. From directors to actors, to editors, to craft services, these people put their SOULS into these projects.
If one of those people does something terrible, should the others pay the price?
Let’s say it was a boom mic operator that committed a crime: still boycott?
The truth is, people do terrible things. I fear that if we boycott every movie in which one cast/crewmember did something awful at some point in their lives, then we all of a sudden don’t have any watchable movies (sports, concerts) left.
That’s just my take.
Kimberly S ~ Jun 13, 2021 at 7:08 pm
I guess the only thing I have to say is: “gabby” stated that Ansel pressured her to having sexual relations with him correct? But how did he pressure her? Like she obviously agreed to meeting up with him. She walked herself to his place after having some very “sexual texts” between both of them. What did she think those messages were going to lead to? And Did he kidnap her from her home at gun point? 17 year old girls should also be held responsible for acting like adults and playing adult games when not prepared for the consequences that come with them.
Katie ~ Jun 2, 2021 at 5:00 pm
A lot of people like to disregard the allegations against him because “no charges were filed” yet fail to realize sexual assault is extremely underreported. When it does get reported, there is a very small chance of a conviction.
Gabby isn’t even the only woman to come forward about his online behavior. Allegedly asking 16 year olds if they’ve been with older men and telling them not to tell their parents via the same snapchat account he gave to Gabby should be enough for anyone to draw line. There is photographs, evidence, dates that match, he even follows these women from his verified accounts. These aren’t baseless claims.
This was something that definitely should have been taken seriously and investigated. Elgort and his family must have the media on payroll to barely cover this. Out of the slew of allegations that came out that week, hers stuck. Not to mention all of the other allegations against Justin Bieber, Riverdale cast, etc came after hers and started off with “because of Gabby’s bravery…” It all seems pretty fishy to me, almost as if they were set up as a distraction and a way to discredit her claim.
Rachel Zegler has even tweeted about how she was disappointed and has unfollowed Ansel and his associates. A few other cast members including Ariana DeBose have done the same. It will be awkward if they stupidly keep him attached to press and try and sweep this under the rug like they have been doing.
The very least Ansel can do is take some responsibility for his online behavior if he is going to deny Gabby’s allegation. His statement states “it simply never happened” but completely leaves out what did happen. In my opinion it is obvious he is trying to hide or dance around something in the response. It was probably one of the least empathetic statements I have ever read and you can tell he doesn’t feel bad or care.
Clark ~ May 30, 2021 at 12:31 am
This article is highly unprofessional and biased. Seems like the author was more interested in resurfacing the accusations against Ansel rather then exploring the subject of movie and its predecessor. If so, I don’t see a reason for a decent review, that would be a waste of time. I will just make it clear that no feature film or a TV show should be boycotted because of one person’s actions. These projects are a collective work’s result, therefore any recommendation not to watch this result solely because of a single man or woman’s deeds, whether they’re guilty of any kind of misconduct or not, is disrespectful and infantile.
SW Wilson ~ May 19, 2021 at 9:05 pm
Natalie Wood is not a role model for Jews, because she was not Jewish. Her parents were Russian. Natalie was raised in the Russian Orthodox faith in Santa Rosa, California, and described herself as Russian. I don’t think she was especially good in the movie, although Rita Moreno was fantastic.
mplo ~ Oct 27, 2021 at 1:00 pm
I, too, thought that Rita Moreno was utterly fantastic in the old, original 1961 film version of West Side Story (which is my all time favorite movie, hands down!), but I thought that both NatalieWood and Richard Beymer were okay as Maria and Tony.
Philip Brock ~ May 12, 2021 at 7:40 am
Your article makes a glaring research misstep. Natalie Wood was not Jewish. She was from a Russian Orthodox background, information which can be easily obtained in any of the biographies about her. Her grave marker even bears a Russian Orthodox cross.
Gerry Gilbert ~ May 11, 2021 at 11:02 pm
This is a remake of a classic that should not have made and no one should see. It is a dececration of the otiginal made justvto make money. Shsme
mplo ~ Oct 27, 2021 at 1:04 pm
Good points, Gerry! I totally agree with you. The old, original 1961 film version won ten well-deserved and well earned Academy Awards, including Best Picture when it came out into the movie theatres in late October of 1961. This great golden oldie-but-keeper of a classic movie-musical should not have been rebooted/remade at all.
mplo ~ Oct 27, 2021 at 1:44 pm
Thank you for a great comment, Gerry! I totally agree with you here!
mplo ~ Nov 4, 2021 at 3:03 pm
I agree with you here, gerry. Thank you so much for stating your point.
Olivia ~ May 7, 2021 at 6:08 pm
Hi
Thank you very much for your article
However I would just like to say a few things
1. No criminal charges were filed against ansel
2. The same day he got accused on social media. So did Justin beiber and some of the cast from riverdale
3. U are saying to give ppl the benefit of the doubt. But then saying to ppl not to see the film.
4. Nobody knows the truth. Also ppl will make their own minds up to see the movie or not.
mplo ~ Oct 27, 2021 at 12:57 pm
As a woman, I’m inclined to believe the girls’s stories about Ansel Elgort. This disgusting scenario has stiffened my resolve to vote my pocketbook and not go to see Spielberg’s reboot/remake of the film version of West Side Story when it comes to the movie theatres at all, this December. I was not planning to go see Spielberg’s film version of West Side Story at all, because I’ve got a gut reaction against reboots/remakes of great older classic films, especially something such as WestSide Story, and, as a devout fan of the old, original 1961 film version of WestSide Story, I have a strong preference for the old, original film of WSS.
DEC ~ Nov 20, 2021 at 11:59 am
Thank you Olivia for bein a voice of true justice not joining the chorus of Guilty thanks to social media words & innuendo. We are watching this version of West Side Story because the 1961 film wasn’t the Original. This remake is an expansion version of the Original Broadway Version. The 1961 had several flaws. The Lovers weren’t singers/dancers. Maria’s accent was not realistic nor was she Latina. Tony was reduced to being a nice guy despite Beymer’s wanting to play him as an ex Gang Leader. The only Latina in the film was Rita Moreno & she lit the sky! Think about what it could have been if Tony had a believe past or Maria a Latina not to mention they could sing. See this version because finally at last someone is doing it they way it should be done.
Barbara Tkach ~ Dec 7, 2021 at 12:33 am
Exactly People are so damm critical to begin with especially even if they don’t have all the facts I will be going to see Stephen Spielbergs remake of the 2021 version of this Amazing story that I pretty much grew up with and don’t care wth anyone thinks about that
Allen jay ~ Mar 18, 2022 at 1:48 pm
First, I thought the new West side story was amazing. I had doubts about it, having seen the original 1961 movie. I wondered why are they going to remake a classic? I love the movie so much I watched it again the next day on a streaming service. I was puzzled by the reviews. Some critics hated it, while the others loved it. Your article bothered me, first because you stated that since Natalie Wood played the role of Maria, You suggest that her role in west side story it was a stereotype for a Jewish girl. You now know that Miss Wood Is not Jewish but of Ukrainian Russian dissent. I was turned off, not by the movie, but by your obviously prejudiced manner As shown in the opinion piece.