Hans Niemann Sues Magnus Carlsen for Defamation After Chess Cheating Scandal
October 31, 2022
Hans Niemann, currently ranked #40 in the world based on his chess success, was recently accused of cheating by the #1 ranked player, Magnus Carlsen. Carlsen sat down to play against Niemann during the 2022 Sinquefield Cup and resigned from the game after a singular move. Following this resignation, Carlsen also withdrew from the tournament without warning. He later made a statement via Twitter stating that he believes Niemann has “cheated more – and more recently – than he has publicly admitted” because there is no way that Niemann was able to come up with a perfect response to Carlsen’s opening play as well as shoot up in the chess rankings as quickly as he did without some sort of aid. Niemann has admitted to cheating twice in his career, however in online games instead of in-person over-the-board games. As one can imagine, it is much easier to cheat in online games through platforms such as Chess.com than it is to cheat in person, which has led to a lot of speculation on what exactly Niemann has been doing in order to cheat.
There are several theories as to how Niemann was able to cheat in an in-person tournament. The most popular (and most hilarious) theory is that Niemann used some sort of vibrating device controlled by a chess-playing computer to dictate his next move. There is currently no evidence supporting this particular theory, however many coders are trying to replicate the device to see if this method is even a possibility. As noted by programmer Ron Sijm who has created Buttfish, a possible model for Niemann’s device, it is incredibly difficult to translate a series of pulses into carrying out a chess move. While it is a fun theory, it is not clear whether there is any truth in it or not.
The allegations made by Carlsen have shaken the chess world, so much so that Chess.com launched its own investigation into whether or not Niemann had been cheating on their platform to match his cheating in real life. The investigation was unable to prove that he had cheated since August 2020 when he turned himself in, but the investigators were able to say that Niemann cheated in more than 100 games, which is more games than he had previously admitted to cheating in. The International Chess Federation (FIDE) is currently launching an investigation into Niemann’s over-the-board play but has not reported their findings yet.
In the wake of the accusations, Niemann has not been silent. He has said that he will not back down and that his chess playing speaks for itself, insinuating that his chess playing was completely genuine and not falsified in any way. In the latest development in this saga, Niemann is now filing a lawsuit against Carlsen for $100 million dollars, claiming defamation. Chess.com has made it clear that they are not in support of Niemann pressing charges, as it takes away from the integrity and culture of the game of chess. Carlsen has not yet responded to the allegations that Niemann has laid against him, and many are struggling to take the lawsuit seriously as Niemann is only 19 years old, as well as suing Carlsen for saying something that seems in the realm of possibility based on his cheating history.
There is seemingly no resolution in sight between Niemann, Carlsen, and the chess community. However, it is clear that Niemann is very serious about getting what he believes he deserves to offset the amount of shame and defamation that Carlsen’s statement has created. Without the support of Chess.com and the wider chess community, it is unclear how successful Niemann will be going forward in his efforts for justice.
Correction: Magnus “Carlson” changed to “Carlsen” on Nov. 1.
Andrew ~ Nov 7, 2022 at 8:55 pm
Hans Neimann? I only know about Neiman Marcus on account of me being affluent and fashionable
Matt Rushford ~ Nov 14, 2022 at 2:04 pm
Neiman and Marcus Don’t Even Know You
Tom ~ Nov 5, 2022 at 8:42 am
Niemann ought to have simply sued Carlsen alone for slander, liberl, defamation, because Carlsen accused him of cheating with no evicence, and further investigation by chess.com and FIDE’s cheat-finder found no reason to b elieve that Niemann had cheated in his win against Carlsen.
Niemann’s past record of cheating or not hjis irrelevant to the question of whether he has been slandered, libelled, defamed by Carlsen.
By adding others (chess.com.namamura, etc. ) he has made the case more complicated and less certain. Had her targetted Carlsen alone would he not have won his case and been awareded substantial damages? I do not see what possible defence Carlsen could have.
Chessy ~ Nov 1, 2022 at 7:55 pm
This isn’t even the correct sequence of events. Carlsen was defeated by Niemann in one tournament and then withdrew from that tournament. The next tournament they were in together Carlsen played one move against Niemann and resigned the game, but went on to win the tournament.
Who ~ Nov 13, 2022 at 7:43 pm
asked
u r a loser ~ Nov 14, 2022 at 6:47 pm
you write the article then
Annonymous Professor ~ Nov 1, 2022 at 3:00 pm
This is a pretty funny read. Way to get some attention from your university. Please note, Magnus’s last name is Carlson, not Carlsen.
While opinion pieces do give you a lot of liberty to insert your views, I would still be careful about injecting your opinion next to other people’s quotes and reactions. For example, you pushed next to Carlsen’s quote statements like, “because there is no way that Niemann was able to come up with a perfect response to Carlson’s opening play as well as shoot up in the chess rankings as quickly as he did without some sort of aid.” You also said that Chess.com doesn’t support the suit because, “as it takes away from the integrity and culture of the game of chess.” I don’t think it is a great move to project your opinion onto other people’s opinions. Mind-reading isn’t really a great game to play. Rather, providing your opinion on why these events are beneficial or not for chess or why you do or don’t believe Carlsen/Chess.com’s press releases are reasonable ways to share your opinion.
Good luck in your writing career.
Annonymous Poofessor ~ Nov 7, 2022 at 3:00 pm
Anonymous Professor (doubtful). Yes, opinion pieces like this do give you a lot of freedom. So does anonymous trolling. I don’t think the author was layering their own opinion onto the quotes. I believe it is called a paraphrase “.. because there is no way that Niemann was able to come up with a perfect response to Carlsen’s opening play as well as shoot up in the chess rankings as quickly as he did without some sort of aid..” For example, this would be a paraphrase of the prevailing opinion from several websites. Just a guess. This isn’t mind-reading. It is a summary based on research. Your reaction to this student piece is what I would expect from a person trying to demean others. Not the best approach for a professor. Good luck on your teaching career!
Also, feel free to waste your time responding to this. I will not be reading it.
3D Squelton ~ Nov 13, 2022 at 7:40 pm
you must be fun at parties. good luck with your mom’s writing career.
u suck ~ Nov 14, 2022 at 6:49 pm
hey prof,
number 1, I would never take a class with u if this is how you talk to students. number 2, this is an OPINIONS piece, can you read or is that not part of your job?? number 3, your response makes no sense!
good luck in your writing career